Category Archives: SCOTUS

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia by Orin Kerr Volokh Conspiracy: Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States by Orin Kerr

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: A Few Thoughts on Collins v. Virginia & Four Thoughts on Byrd v. United States

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches by Damon Root:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception” by Amy Howe:

Posted in Automobile exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Justices to consider scope of Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception”

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement? by Amy Howe:

Posted in SCOTUS, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: For Fourth Amendment purposes, does it matter who is on the car-rental agreement?

There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

Today (as best as can be determined) is the 414th anniversary of Semayne’s Case recognizing both knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine at common law. Back then, the dates of decisions weren’t as important and they appeared in reporters well after … Continue reading

Posted in Common law, Knock and announce, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess)

Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess) by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess)

Police News: How SCOTUS impacted law enforcement in 2017

Police News: How SCOTUS impacted law enforcement in 2017 by Terrence P. Dwyer

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Police News: How SCOTUS impacted law enforcement in 2017

The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age

The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age by Alan Butler: This case will not be decided in a vacuum, and it appears that the justices appreciate both the magnitude of the moment and … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument by Will Baude:

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument

Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers”

Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers” by Mike Rappaport:

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers”

The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance

The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance Jeffrey Rosen: Justices found common ground in asserting the relevance of the Fourth Amendment in the electronic age, even as they cited sharply different rationales.

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance