Category Archives: Special needs

CA8: Linn State Tech College’s student drug testing policy constitutional; special needs proven [Update: rev’d en banc 12/22/16]

Missouri’s Linn State Technical College’s student drug testing policy is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment. After the prior appeal, Barrett v. Claycomb, 705 F.3d 315 (8th Cir. 2013), the district court erred in conducting a program-by-program analysis of where the … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Special needs | Comments Off on CA8: Linn State Tech College’s student drug testing policy constitutional; special needs proven [Update: rev’d en banc 12/22/16]

IA applies special needs doctrine to parole searches for first time

Iowa applies the special needs doctrine to parole searches for the first time. It alluded to something like that in 1970, but the special needs doctrine hadn’t developed then. This parole search was reasonable under Griffin and the special needs … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search, Special needs | Comments Off on IA applies special needs doctrine to parole searches for first time

OR: Where defendant was to be booked and released, jail search was unreasonable

Search at jail wasn’t shown to be necessary or inevitable, and state conceded error (decided under state constitution). Defendant likely would have been booked and released. State v. Moulton, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372 (October 8, 2014).* Defendant’s refusal to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Special needs, Standing | Comments Off on OR: Where defendant was to be booked and released, jail search was unreasonable

CA9: “brutal and physically invasive” warrantless rectal search in jail should have been suppressed

In a “brutal and physically invasive” warrantless rectal search in jail, the motion to suppress should have been granted. He was handcuffed, Tased, and surrounded by five officers, and exigent circumstances were lacking. United States v. Fowlkes, 770 F.3d 748 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Special needs, Strip search | Comments Off on CA9: “brutal and physically invasive” warrantless rectal search in jail should have been suppressed

CA2: Even if SORA was a search and seizure it would be reasonable under special needs

Even if the New York Sex Offender Registration Act constituted a search and seizure or implicated the Fourth Amendment at all [which is not clear or obvious], it would survive special needs analysis. Doe v. Cuomo, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Special needs | Comments Off on CA2: Even if SORA was a search and seizure it would be reasonable under special needs

BNA: Justices Won’t Review If Breathalyzer Tests Of New York City Officers Are Constitutional

BNA: Justices Won’t Review If Breathalyzer Tests Of New York City Officers Are Constitutional from Daily Labor Report by Kevin P. McGowan: May 27 — Denying a petition filed by the New York City police officers’ union, the U.S. Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Special needs | Comments Off on BNA: Justices Won’t Review If Breathalyzer Tests Of New York City Officers Are Constitutional