Category Archives: Cell phones

WaPo: How accurate are historical cell-site records?

WaPo: How accurate are historical cell-site records? by Orin Kerr: Not very accurate, says Douglas Starr over at The New Yorker. An excerpt: If I make a cell call from Kenmore Square, in my home town of Boston, you might … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: How accurate are historical cell-site records?

E.D.Tenn.: The day after Riley, Davis GFE saves a warrantless cell phone search despite no controlling case; this is just wrong

In February, the USMJ found the warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone unreasonable, but in Davis good faith [despite the lack of controlling law in support?]. The day after Riley, the USDJ finds that the search of a cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: The day after Riley, Davis GFE saves a warrantless cell phone search despite no controlling case; this is just wrong

Politico: Phone ruling resonates in NSA fight

Politico: Phone ruling resonates in NSA fight by Josh Gerstein: The ruling could also give a boost to lawsuits challenging the NSA’s collection of phone call data.

Posted in Cell phones, FISA | Comments Off on Politico: Phone ruling resonates in NSA fight

LawFare: A Failure of Protocol

LawFare: A Failure of Protocol by Tim Edgar: The Supreme Court’s decision requiring a warrant for searches of cell phones incident to arrest affirms that we are entitled to privacy in the digital age. These expectations, the Chief Justice explains, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on LawFare: A Failure of Protocol

ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology

ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology by Mason C. Clutter: Some thought the Supreme Court in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie, the two cellphone searches incident to arrest cases this Term, would split … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology

News stories about Riley thus far (updated)

NYT: Major Ruling Shields Privacy of Cellphones NYT: The Supreme Court Justices Have Cellphones, Too NYT: Cellphone Ruling Could Alter Police Methods, Experts Say WaPo: Supreme Court says police must get warrants for most cellphone searches WaPo: Volokh: The Significance … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on News stories about Riley thus far (updated)

SCOTUS: A search warrant is required for a cell phone; generally no search incident

Riley v. California: A search warrant is generally required for search of a cell phone. The search incident justifications do not apply to the wealth of personal information that likely will be there. Riley v. California, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4497, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Search incident | Comments Off on SCOTUS: A search warrant is required for a cell phone; generally no search incident

W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”

“Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers, which the involved detectives fully understood and conveyed to the magistrate judge. … United States v. Jones, Cr. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54575 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”

W.D.Pa.: SW for entire contents of cell phone was not overbroad in a drug case

A search warrant that was specific but covered virtually the entire contents of a cell phone was not overbroad where the phone was alleged to be used in drug dealing because it would all be potential evidence. The good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for entire contents of cell phone was not overbroad in a drug case

RI: No reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages sent to and on another’s telephone

Defendant has no standing to challenge the [consent] search of a cell phone of another person even though that cell phone was in his place where he would otherwise have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This case started with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on RI: No reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages sent to and on another’s telephone

Four SCOTUS opinion days left this Term: today, 25th, 26th, 30th–cell phone warrant cases still pending

SCOTUS has four opinion days left this Term. And, of course, still pending are the two cell phone search cases argued April 29th: Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie. They are highly significant privacy cases, and certainly all … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Four SCOTUS opinion days left this Term: today, 25th, 26th, 30th–cell phone warrant cases still pending

WWAY ABC Wilmington: Investigation claims WPD uses spy gear to snoop on citizens

WWAY ABC Wilmington: Investigation claims WPD uses spy gear to snoop on citizens: Is the Wilmington Police Department using spy gear to trick your cell phone into giving away private info? That’s what the ACLU and New Hanover County’s Public … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WWAY ABC Wilmington: Investigation claims WPD uses spy gear to snoop on citizens

WaPo: The Eleventh Circuit’s novel approach to the Fourth Amendment in the Davis case

WaPo: The Eleventh Circuit’s novel approach to the Fourth Amendment in the Davis case by Orin Kerr: I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. Quartavious Davis holding that the Fourth Amendment protects … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: The Eleventh Circuit’s novel approach to the Fourth Amendment in the Davis case

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and regional variation

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and regional variation by Orin Kerr: The recent circuit split between the Fifth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit over collecting cell-site records without a warrant prompts an interesting question about how Fourth Amendment doctrine responds to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informational privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: The Fourth Amendment and regional variation

AntiWar.com: Your Local Police May Be Collecting Metadata

AntiWar.com: Your Local Police May Be Collecting Metadata by Lucy Steigerwald: When talking of freewheeling domestic spying, it would behoove us to remember that it’s not just the National Security Agency (NSA) that needs reform and a tight leash. Hell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on AntiWar.com: Your Local Police May Be Collecting Metadata

AP: US pushing local police departments to keep quiet on cell-phone surveillance technology

AP: US pushing local police departments to keep quiet on cell-phone surveillance technology by Jack Gillum and Eileen Sullivan: The Obama administration has been quietly advising local police not to disclose details about surveillance technology they are using to sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on AP: US pushing local police departments to keep quiet on cell-phone surveillance technology

CA11: In a case of first impression, “cell site location information is within the subscriber’s reasonable expectation of privacy.”

In an interesting and thorough analysis, the Eleventh Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Sentelle of the D.C. Circuit sitting by designation, “hold[s] that cell site location information is within the subscriber’s reasonable expectation of privacy.” The court also discussed, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: In a case of first impression, “cell site location information is within the subscriber’s reasonable expectation of privacy.”

CA10: Not unreasonable to handcuff occupants during execution of SW for gun

In execution of a search warrant for a gun, it wasn’t unreasonable for the officers to handcuff people there for officer safety even through there was a suggestion that the gun had moved before the SW arrived. Wigley v. City … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Not unreasonable to handcuff occupants during execution of SW for gun

AR: Stop was without RS where it was to tell defendant his neighbors complained about him

Defendant’s stop was without any reasonable suspicion he had committed any kind of offense. The stop was to tell defendant that the neighbors were complaining about him. Dewitt v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 369 (June 4, 2014).* The use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Stop was without RS where it was to tell defendant his neighbors complained about him

S.D.N.Y.: Gov’t required to limit scope of application for location data

A cell phone tower dump of cell site location data on phones is not subject to a reasonable expectation of privacy because the system works by keeping track of location all the time and the customers have to know it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informational privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Gov’t required to limit scope of application for location data