TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Defense counsel’s motion to suppress coming during trial at the end of the officer’s testimony wasn’t timely. Brown v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1014 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Feb. 3, 2026)* (unpublished).

An automobile exception search can occur at the time of the stop or later. United States v. Douglas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20987 (D. Vt. Feb. 2, 2026).*

Officers did a protective sweep of an apartment after it was shot up, and a M4 magazine was lawfully seen. State v. Hamilton, 2026 Wash. App. LEXIS 177 (Feb. 2, 2026)* (unpublished).

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a water bottle from which DNA was taken left in an interrogation room. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20791 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, DNA, Protective sweep, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.