GA: Curtilage for 4A purposes isn’t the same for defense of the home from an intruder

Curtilage for Fourth Amendment purposes isn’t the same for defense of the home from an intruder. Graham v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 25 (Feb. 3, 2026):

On appeal, Graham contends that defense of habitation was an applicable theory because the fight with Franklin and his friends occurred in the curtilage of Graham’s home and the curtilage is treated as part of the dwelling itself for certain purposes. It is generally true that a search warrant that authorizes the search of a home also “extends by implication to areas within the curtilage of the dwelling.” Gebhardt v. State, 307 Ga. 587, 599 (2019). However, Graham has not cited any cases in which the “curtilage” was considered a part of “habitation” for the purpose of a defense of habitation instruction, and we have found none. To the contrary, we have held that a justification defense based on the defense of habitation is not available “where there is no evidence that the victim was attempting to enter or attack the habitation at the time he was injured.” Jackson v. State, 318 Ga. 393, 399 (2024). And Graham notably does not claim, nor does the evidence support, that Franklin was trying to enter Graham’s home.

This entry was posted in Curtilage. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.