KY: Landlord’s maintenance entry with electrician and a LEO because of a feared weapon was reasoanable

Defendant was schizophrenic and he was destroying the wiring in his apartment. The landlord got an electrician and then they brought a police officer because they feared he had a weapon (which he did). The entry by the police was preventative and not investigative, and the viewing of the firearm by a convicted felon was reasonable. Crite v. Commonwealth, 2024 Ky. LEXIS 386 (Dec. 19, 2024):

Considering the totality of the evidence and the prior non-controlling authority from our sister courts, we observe that the police search of Crite’s apartment was not for the purpose of gathering any evidence but was minimally invasive and only conducted so that Robertson and the electrician could safely enter. Such entry was needed to facilitate the electrician making the emergency repairs needed to eliminate any fire risk to the four-plex, and set the stage for restoration of all services, which was required for Century to uphold its duties to Crite under the terms of the lease. During the heat of summer, Century could reasonably believe that restoring the electricity to run the air conditioning was needed for habitability. The police acted reasonably in entering given the information that Robertson had consent to enter under the terms of the lease to address an electrical hazard, but she did not feel safe to do so given the information that she had received that Crite was a schizophrenic who was off his medication, had acted irrationally in ripping out electrical wiring throughout the apartment, had a gun, was a felon, and could be present in the apartment and still acting irrationally.

This entry was posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Private search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.