MA: Late disclosure of product of search wasn’t exculpatory so no prejudice

Defendant sought in discovery the call log from the search of his cell phone. The state didn’t provide it timely. It was not exculpatory in trial counsel’s view because it contradicted the defense witnesses and whatever defense they had for trial. “We need not speculate what difference, if any, the call log would have made in the jury’s deliberations. That dimension of the analysis is foreclosed by the record, which indicates that timely disclosure would not have affected the outcome of the trial because the defense would not have introduced the evidence.” Commonwealth v. Diaz, 2022 Mass. App. LEXIS 1 (Jan. 6, 2022).*

The clear inferences from the affidavit for this search warrant show probable cause for drugs in defendant’s house. United States v. Nicholson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 346 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2022).*

Defendant’s traffic stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Bryant, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2528 (M.D.Ga. Jan. 6, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.