CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

“[T]he disclosure of the plaintiffs’ medical records to law enforcement officers for the purpose of investigating Dr. Pompy’s allegedly illegal activities did not violate their Fourth Amendment rights or their constitutional right to privacy.” Micks-Harm v. Nichols, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 15487 (6th Cir. May 24, 2021).

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop and patdown when he was encountered, smelled of marijuana, kept his hands in his pockets, and backed away from the officer, creating the impression in the officer that flight was imminent and that defendant was likely a drug dealer. State v. Byrd, 2021 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 228 (May 24, 2021).*

Carpenter is not retroactive on collateral relief. State v. Taylor, 2021-Ohio-1745, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1692 (2d Dist. May 21, 2021).*

Defendant’s way overly tinted windows was reasonable suspicion for his stop. The officer couldn’t see into the car at all. State v. Hubbard, 2021-Ohio-1740, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1691 (2d Dist. May 21, 2021).*