OH5: For collective knowledge, state needs to call all officers involved

Defendant prevails on his claim the state failed to show collective knowledge. Only one officer testified at the suppression hearing, and nothing showed what the reporting officer knew. State v. Chattoo, 2020-Ohio-6800, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4635 (5th Dist. Dec. 18, 2020).

Defendant was not in custody during a traffic stop when he was asked for consent and consented. Cox v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 545 (Dec. 21, 2020).*

The search warrant here was based on a year-long report of gunfire near defendant’s place, and the most recent was rapid fire consistent with the weapon they were seeking. Therefore, it was not stale. United States v. Duke, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39901 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.