D.Mont.: Govt had insufficient evidence defendant lived at place searched to enter with arrest warrant

The police had insufficient evidence defendant resided at the place searched to justify entry under an arrest warrant. “The government contends that the following facts, in combination, were sufficient to establish probable cause that Doney lived at 108 Buena Vista: (1) Krengel told Deputy Marshal Smith that Doney ‘stayed’ [off and on some] at 108 Buena Vista; (2) task force surveillance saw Doney’s car at 108 Buena Vista on November 14, 2013 [the day of the entry]; (3) a man leaving the residence told surveillance that Doney was at the residence at that time. These facts, considered in their totality, are insufficient to establish probable cause under Payton and Watts, however.” United States v. Rathbun, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26593 (D.Mont. March 1, 2016).

Allegedly being bitten by a prison guard during a cell extraction fight is not a Fourth Amendment claim. O’Connor v. Kelley, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3683 (11th Cir. Feb. 29, 2016).*

Defendant’s stop was justified by his erratic driving, and his furtive movements at the time of the stop justified extending it and a protective weapons search of the car under Michigan v. Long. United States v. Thompson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26143 (W.D.Ky. March 1, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.