Daily Archives: January 27, 2019

M.D.Ala.: Def’s 2255 alternative SITA argument wouldn’t succeed; search issue litigated at first as protective sweep

One ground of defendant’s 2255 was that defense counsel didn’t pursue his motion to suppress in the district court as a search incident. It was litigated as a protective sweep, defendant lost, and it was affirmed on appeal. His search … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Def’s 2255 alternative SITA argument wouldn’t succeed; search issue litigated at first as protective sweep

OH6: Home surveillance DVR not within “computer hardware and software” in home SW

A home surveillance DVR was not reasonably included within the search warrant for drug transction records or “computer [or] related computer hardware and software.” State v. Williamson, 2019-Ohio-241, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 245 (6th Dist. Jan. 25, 2019) [*P23] Here, … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on OH6: Home surveillance DVR not within “computer hardware and software” in home SW

IN: Long term missing person report and house in disarray justified emergency entry

A missing person report which included no birthday call for the only time in the person’s life with a house in disarray here justified a warrantless entry into the house to see what was going on. The entry was valid … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Long term missing person report and house in disarray justified emergency entry

Minor discrepancies and lack of contemporaneous notes of surveillance didn’t make these observations not credible to fact finder

Some discrepancies in the testimony of two officers about defendant’s consent doesn’t make them unbelievable. It’s the province of the fact finder, here the USMJ, to make that determination and consent was found by a preponderance of the evidence. United … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Minor discrepancies and lack of contemporaneous notes of surveillance didn’t make these observations not credible to fact finder

E.D.Mich.: Def can’t use 2255 IAC claim to undo 2015 CSLI

Defendant filed a 2255 to set aside his conviction under Carpenter because the government in 2015 used CSLI to aid in his conviction. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing what he claims is the trial court’s hint to challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def can’t use 2255 IAC claim to undo 2015 CSLI