Daily Archives: January 12, 2019

OH2: PC for SW for flash drive for possible evidence was shown by prior allegation of recorded assault

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant for suspicion of sexual assault since he was leaving the house from where the report came at 2:30 am. A search warrant for a flash drive found in defendant’s backpack was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: PC for SW for flash drive for possible evidence was shown by prior allegation of recorded assault

Cal.4: There is no 4A issue in police creating fake social media identities to “friend” a suspect to see more private pages

There is no Fourth Amendment issue in a police officer posing as a false friend on social media accounts to see defendant’s private pages he shares with others. Here, defendant was seen wearing a gold chain taken from his robbery … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Cal.4: There is no 4A issue in police creating fake social media identities to “friend” a suspect to see more private pages

CA6: Carpenter decided after notice of appeal didn’t apply to defendant

CSLI was admitted at trial without objection. Carpenter was decided after the notice of appeal. On plain error review, there is no error because the CSLI was lawfully obtained at the time and the good faith exception applies. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Carpenter decided after notice of appeal didn’t apply to defendant

CA6 sustains Playpen warrant under GFE

Playpen warrant was valid under good faith exception. United States v. Moorehead, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 639 (6th Cir. Jan. 9, 2019).* Defendant was not entitled to discovery of the exploit code used in the NIT warrant to locate him. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6 sustains Playpen warrant under GFE

CA9: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply is SSI proceedings unless illegal search “egregious”

The exclusionary rule does not apply to a Social Security ALJ’s determination on supplemental income unless the illegal search can be shown to be egregious. Viewing the video, this one was not. Foote v. Berryhill, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 928 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply is SSI proceedings unless illegal search “egregious”