Category Archives: Motion to suppress

DC: Failing to file a motion to suppress is waiver of the issue

Defendant never filed a motion to suppress prior to trial, so the search and seizure claim is waived. Proctor v. United States, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 55 (March 16, 2017), amended 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 331 (Oct. 26, 2017). The … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Failing to file a motion to suppress is waiver of the issue

E.D.Wis.: USMJ declines adversary briefing by Google for a SW for email; take it to the USDJ

Google objected to a search warrant for two email accounts, whether located in the U.S. or not. Its motion for a briefing schedule is denied. Despite case law elsewhere, the District Judge is the one to take up adversarial litigation … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: USMJ declines adversary briefing by Google for a SW for email; take it to the USDJ

D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s untimely motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Drexler, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13833 (D.Nev. Feb. 1, 2017). Defendant was arrested for bank robbery, and a search incident to arrest of his person was valid and based on … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failing to cite facts or authority or provide a cogent argument. United States v. Guerrier, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2017):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

“In light of the fact that Defendant fails to specify which statements he is seeking to suppress and the insufficiency of Defendant’s explanation for why the arrest warrant lacks probable cause, I am unable to properly consider these motions. Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive

“In any event, it is clear that Officer Carter failed to remove the license plates and registration receipt before impounding the car. Because the officer overlooked the legislatively imposed requirements for the impoundment, it appears he was motivated solely by … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive

OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim

Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Gibson, 2017-Ohio-102, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 107 (8th Dist. Jan 12, 2017). Defendant was stopped for swerving on the highway. When he … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim

DE: Trial court couldn’t decide PC where def didn’t raise it in motion to suppress; reconsideration granted; def has to frame the issues in the motion to suppress

At issue was a seizure and then search of defendant’s cell phone with a search warrant looking for an incriminating text message that was already seen by the police on the recipient’s cell phone. At the hearing, the Superior Court … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Trial court couldn’t decide PC where def didn’t raise it in motion to suppress; reconsideration granted; def has to frame the issues in the motion to suppress

FL2: 12 year old accosted for no reason didn’t voluntarily consent

Police searched two 12 year old boys playing in the grassy common area of their mobile home park. Their alleged consent was involuntary because of their young age and no reason to accost them in the first place. Marijuana was … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: 12 year old accosted for no reason didn’t voluntarily consent

NJ: Protective sweep requires at least some slight justification another person may be present; here, there was none

A woman called police as a victim of domestic violence. When they arrived, she was in her car, and she gave an address of where her assailant was but no name. They go to that address and enter, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NJ: Protective sweep requires at least some slight justification another person may be present; here, there was none

IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived

Defendant was stopped for having one headlight. The specific claim that there was no probable cause for pulling him over because he wasn’t on a public road was never presented to the trial court, and it’s waived. State v. Tusler, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived

CA9: Motion to suppress after conviction wasn’t timely

Defendant’s motion to suppress her cell phone search two weeks after conviction wasn’t timely, and no good cause shown. Riley being decided after her conviction is not “good cause.” United States v. Gonzalez, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14298 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: Motion to suppress after conviction wasn’t timely

S.D.Ga.: Motion to suppress wasn’t timely and discovery wasn’t that complicated; but he’d lose on standing or merits anyway

Defendant’s motion to suppress wasn’t timely, and he had plenty of time to get it filed and didn’t give an excuse or even mention it being late. “Large volumes of discovery can indeed constitute good cause for addressing a motion’s … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Motion to suppress wasn’t timely and discovery wasn’t that complicated; but he’d lose on standing or merits anyway

S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

Defendant’s motion to suppress was denied because he didn’t even suggest in his papers he had standing in the vehicle he was only a passenger in. United States v. Londonio, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8472 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2016). There … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

TN: Laptop search issue first raised in MNT is way too late; issue waived

Defendant was convicted of four counts of rape of a child. A laptop was properly seized from his car with probable cause under the automobile exception. It was searched without a warrant. Defendant waived the search of the computer by … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on TN: Laptop search issue first raised in MNT is way too late; issue waived

OH9: For appellate court to consider trial testimony on motion to suppress, motion to reopen or reconsider required

To get the appellate court to consider trial testimony to supplement the motion to suppress, it’s necessary to renew the motion in the trial court after that point. Otherwise, the appeal proceeds on what was developed at the suppression hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH9: For appellate court to consider trial testimony on motion to suppress, motion to reopen or reconsider required

C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses. It is a reasonable suspicion warranting a patdown. “Such a risk was only heightened here because the ‘traffic violation’ at issue—using forged or stolen … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

OH3: Trial court decided issue defense didn’t raise, and state prejudiced

The trial court erred in sua sponte raising a length of detention issue that the state did not get to respond to. State v. Miller, 2015-Ohio-3529, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3443 (3d Dist. August 31, 2015):

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on OH3: Trial court decided issue defense didn’t raise, and state prejudiced

OH9: A challenge to evidence under the rules of evidence is brought by a motion in limine, not a motion to suppress

A challenge to evidence under the rules of evidence is brought by a motion in limine, not a motion to suppress. That’s for constitutional grounds. State v. Johnson, 2015-Ohio-3449, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3327 (9th Dist. August 26, 2015). One … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on OH9: A challenge to evidence under the rules of evidence is brought by a motion in limine, not a motion to suppress

MD: Oral motion to suppress cell phone was waived: neither timely nor specific

Defendant’s oral motion to suppress the contents of his cell phone the morning of trial was neither timely nor specific as to what was to be suppressed, so it’s treated as waived. Sinclair v. State, 2015 Md. LEXIS 496 (July … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on MD: Oral motion to suppress cell phone was waived: neither timely nor specific