Category Archives: Stop and frisk

MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not an unreasonable search and seizure or a Fourth Amendment issue. Besides, there was no sign anywhere that there would be a turning over of records to law enforcement. Arbor Farms v. Geostar … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

New Law Review Article: “To Corral and Control the Ghetto”: Stop, Frisk, and the Geography of Freedom

“To Corral and Control the Ghetto”: Stop, Frisk, and the Geography of Freedom, Anders Walker, 48 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1223 (2014). Abstract: This article revisits the emergence of stop and frisk law in the 1960s to make three points. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: “To Corral and Control the Ghetto”: Stop, Frisk, and the Geography of Freedom

Two on reasonable suspicion: CA10 & CA5

“We first analyze each of the factors: (1) Officer Devos’s previous encounter with Mr. Garcia [where he ran and aggressively confronted the officer two weeks earlier], (2) Mr. Garcia’s criminal history [which included a prior armed robbery], (3) Officer Devos’s … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Two on reasonable suspicion: CA10 & CA5

OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. State … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

IA: RS for a frisk developed from furtive looks and body movement

Three men were stopped. While Iowa has not adopted the “automatic companion rule,” reasonable suspicion developed from furtive looks and body movement justifying a frisk of two. When one was asked about a weapon, he put up his hands and … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: RS for a frisk developed from furtive looks and body movement

HuffPo: Skin Color Is Not a Crime: Why Stop and Frisk Doesn’t Work

HuffPo: Skin Color Is Not a Crime: Why Stop and Frisk Doesn’t Work by Evan DeFilippis: The Inconsistency of Our Outrage

Posted in Stop and frisk | Leave a comment

OR: No RS for frisk; defendant made no furtive movements and asked why the need for a search

The officer lacked reasonable suspicion that defendant was armed to justify a frisk. Defendant, inter alia, made no furtive movements, and asked why the officers had to search him and his demeanor changed when it came up. Nothing here indicates … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Leave a comment