M.D.Pa.: Water Authority’s entry onto curtilage to cut off water for nonpayment was not an unreasonable search

Entering the curtilage to turn off water service for nonpayment of the bill is not a Fourth Amendment seizure or entry. Holland v. Jersey Shore Area Joint Water Auth., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209672 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2026)*:

[C]ourts have frequently found that a utility employee’s entry upon the property of a customer for the sole purpose of shutting off water service, when that shut-off is unaccompanied by any other potential criminal penalty, is constitutionally reasonable conduct which does not violate the Fourth Amendment. … [As long ago as 1974.] As our sister court has observed when denying a similar Fourth Amendment claim: “Access to utility service cannot reasonably be construed as a ‘personal effect’ which is protected by the Fourth Amendment.” … Therefore, the limited intrusion upon the plaintiff’s curtilage for the sole purpose of cutting off water service for non-payment does not rise to the level of an unreasonable search or seizure condemned by the Fourth Amendment.

This entry was posted in Curtilage. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.