LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone included “or within cloud based storage accessible by the device.” The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026).

Defense counsel’s failure to file a suppression motion isn’t ineffective assistance of counsel without saying what it was about and how the petitioner would win. Gallardo v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96906 (N.D. Tex. May 1, 2026).*

A vehicle may be stopped for actions of the passenger. Here it was belief that he threw a bottle out of the car and there was no one else around. He was apparently armed, and a felon. United States v. Gatnoor, No. 25-2052 (8th Cir. May 5, 2026).*

The drug dog arrived before the ticket could be completed, so the dog sniff didn’t extend the stop. State v. Parks, 2026-Ohio-1629 (6th Dist. May 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.