E.D.Cal.: A cell phone number in SW papers isn’t reason to seal them

The government doesn’t provide justification for sealing this search warrant application merely because there are cell phone number in it. It is presumptively a public record. In re Matter of Application by United States for Search Warrant to Search, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218242 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2025).

California law provides a mechanism to challenge searches, and failure to do so here was Stone barred. Bryson v. Madden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221586 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025).*

Defendant’s discovery request for video of the controlled buy that led to the warrant wasn’t timely, and the court could affirm on that basis alone. On the merits, however, it is speculative that it’s Brady material. United States v. Hill, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29357 (11th Cir. Nov. 7, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Discovery, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.