FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

A 911 call about a potential impaired driver with kids in the car justified the officer’s interaction with the defendant. A welfare community caretaking check isn’t unreasonable just because it’s intertwined with a potential crime. Children can’t be expected to fend for themselves in this situation. State v. Leiby, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8339 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 5, 2025).

“As did the district court, for each officer, we start and end with the ‘clearly established law’ prong of the qualified immunity analysis. We do so because Johnson offers no clearly established law applicable to either officer’s conduct, and that is fatal to her arguments for both Connolly and Vado.” It is plaintiff’s burden to show it. Johnson v. Smith, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29049 (5th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025).*

The state’s mechanism for resolution of search and seizure claims is adequate for the Stone bar. McGee v. Warden, Belmont Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218066 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 5, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.