D.Minn.: PC shown for SW for dog sniff at apartment door

There was probable cause for a dog sniff warrant at defendant’s apartment door. There was also probable cause for the warrant for his vehicle. The use of an unwitting informant doesn’t negate probable cause (collecting cases). United States v. Turner, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147348 (D. Minn. Aug. 19, 2024).*

The officer’s testimony and the video show two valid justifications for defendant’s stop. United States v. Turk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147961 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2024).*

“A prudent person with the officers’ knowledge and experience would be more than just suspicious that Defendant Counts open-carried a firearm; in fact, he brandished it in front of them. Therefore, assuming an arrest occurred [and not just a stop], the arrest was valid and the ensuing search incident to arrest justified the recovery of the firearms.” United States v. Counts, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148039 (S.D. Ill. Aug. 19, 2024).*

Defendant filed a motion to suppress under Franks. Later it was withdrawn. The time in between was excludable for speedy trial purposes. People v. Forbes, 2024 IL App (3d) 230152 (Aug. 19, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.