CA6: No special REP in crypto in FinCEN 8300 reporting

There is no special reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment to bar the IRS/FinCEN Form 8300 reporting requirement. Carman v. Yellen, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20033 (6th Cir. Aug. 9, 2024).

Four of petitioner’s 2255 claims involved a search issue, and he had a full and fair opportunity to litigate it before. CoA denied. McGuire v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20036 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2024).*

Petitioner’s successor habeas attempt is denied. One issue is just a rehash of his previously denied Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In re Hill, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20059 (6th Cir. Aug. 8, 2024).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that would have failed. Defense counsel also wrote repeatedly to defendant but he never responded. “Representation between an attorney and their client is not a one-way street. Without participation, communication, and cooperation from the client, which appears to have been lacking here, a defense counsel’s representation can be adversely impacted by their client’s lack of cooperation.” State v. Smith, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 576 (Aug. 9, 2024).

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.