NM: 19-day delay getting a SW for a computer was reasonable considering the diminished possessory interest in it

“The district court concluded, after weighing Defendant’s diminished possessory interest in the tablet and the legitimate interests of law enforcement, that under the circumstances, the nineteen-day delay between when the tablet was seized and when a search warrant was obtained was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. We agree and affirm.” State v. Padilla, 2024 N.M. App. LEXIS 38 (July 15, 2024).

2255 petitioner’s Franks claim fails for no substantial preliminary showing of materiality. United States v. Johnson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123807 (S.D. Miss. July 15, 2024).*

Tinted windows in the vehicle defendant was a passenger in doesn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ellison, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123906 (E.D. Ky. July 11, 2024).*

Yale New Haven Hospital security were not state actors for the Fourth Amendment. With the hospital, they were investigating drug tampering from a dispensing machine. United States v. Falzarano, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124545 (D. Conn. July 15, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.