E.D.Mo.: Listing in inventory only things of some value didn’t make it unreasonable

The officer’s inventory policy was to inventory before towing and then list only that which has value. Things of little value was omitted. Still, his body cam caught it all, so there is a record. This inventory was valid. United States v. McPeters, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17264 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 29, 2026):

In contrast, the evidence presented here demonstrates that the HPD tow policy required officers to complete a Tow Inventory Report but did not specify how that report should be completed. Unlike the tow policy in Rowland, the evidence presented here suggests Officer Eickhoff was free to exercise his discretion in deciding how to fulfill the requirement that he complete a Tow Inventory Report. The Eighth Circuit has held that officers may use discretion in conducting inventory searches “so long as that discretion is exercised according to standard criteria and on the basis or something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity.'” … Officer Eickhoff testified that his body camera recorded all items he observed in McPeters’s car and, in following his department’s tow policy, it was his “standard operating procedure” to only inventory items he deemed to be of high value-in other words items that would likely entice a would-be thief to break into the towed vehicle. While the undersigned may not agree entirely with Officer Eickhoff’s approach, this Court cannot say, based on the evidence of record, his interpretation contravened the HPD policy, was unreasonable, or otherwise made in bad faith.

This entry was posted in Inventory. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.