OH5: Put the affidavit for SW in the record at the suppression hearing

The affidavit for search warrant isn’t in the record on appeal, so the court presumes the regularity of proceedings in the trial court. The record that was made shows that there was probable cause. State v. Hill, 2023-Ohio-4381, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4215 (5th Dist. Dec. 5, 2023).

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. Innocent explanations developed during the investigation were recounted in the affidavit, and further ones wouldn’t change the outcome. There still was probable cause. In addition, the officer didn’t relate all he had about corroborating the CI, but what was there was sufficient. Of course, “probable cause is not a high bar.” United States v. McGee, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215837 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 5, 2023).*

In an unpublished opinion, Wisconsin states that there is no authority for the proposition that child pornography has to be stated to be in the NCMEC database for there to be probable cause. State v. Schye, 2023 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1256 (Dec. 5, 2023)* (unpublished) [This seems to be just a throwaway argument the court finds undeveloped and waived, not that it would ever succeed. And what about homemade child porn that NCMEC doesn’t have a record of yet?]

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.