OH5: Pickup of visitor parked on street could be searched with SW for premises where it was suspected of drug transactions there

Defendant’s pickup was parked on the street in front of another man’s house that was searched with a warrant. His truck was searched too, but wasn’t mentioned in the warrant. “We find the search of the truck was authorized by the search warrant. Given where the vehicle was found, we agree that it was on the property to be searched, and law enforcement’s intelligence regarding activity at the residence gave them reason to believe that appellant’s vehicle was associated with not only the premises but also with the targets of the search.” State v. Cottrell, 2023-Ohio-2240, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2243 (5th Dist. June 29, 2023).

Search warrant for premises that permitted the search of any persons found there was overbroad. Search of defendant was void. People v. Montgomery, 2023 NY Slip Op 03606, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3644 (4th Dept. June 30, 2023).

Defendant’s parole search was justified and reasonable. People v Mcmillan, 2023 NY Slip Op 03620, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654 (4th Dept. June 30, 2023).*

Defendant had the burden of pleading and proving his reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched to have standing. United States v. Cowan, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113284 (M.D. Tenn. June 30, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.