NC: Dog sniff of package in mail stream reasonable

A dog sniff of a package in the mail stream is reasonable. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy from a dog sniff there. State v. Teague, 2022-NCCOA-600, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 748 (Nov. 1, 2022).

Defendants’ motion in limine against the product of a federal search warrant in New Jersey for failure to produce the warrant materials is denied. They don’t even show standing in another’s email account. SEC v. Genovese, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202649 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2022).*

Plaintiff was erroneously detained by court order, but she has no claim against the officers holding her. The district court never decided probable cause but it is evident there was. May v. Pritchett, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30885 (11th Cir. Nov. 8, 2022).*

Defendant’s claim the search of his computer was based on his illegally obtained statement fails because it wasn’t obtained illegally. Also, inevitable discovery applies. United States v. Skally, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203131 (D.R.I. Nov. 8, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, E-mail, Inevitable discovery, Mail and packages, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.