CA8: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at apt door saved by GFE

Pre-Jardines dog sniff at the door of an apartment was valid when it happened, so it is saved by the good faith exception under Davis. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 22977 (8th Cir. Aug. 18, 2022).

“In the present case, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to move to suppress the evidence because the warrantless entry of the home was justified by the emergency aid exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.” Head v. Carl, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147271 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2022).*

Defendant was reasonably suspected of fraud in obtaining a bunch of iPhones by fraud. The alleged reasonable suspicion of a traffic offense doesn’t matter. Solano v. State, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6023 (Tex. App. – Tyler Aug. 17, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.