N.D.Ala.: Imprecision in the SW affidavit isn’t a Franks violation

Imprecision in the affiant investigator’s words doesn’t equate to recklessness for Franks purposes. United States v. Tubbs, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73473 (N.D.Ala. Mar. 14, 2022).*

Defendant’s alleged Franks violation wasn’t even material based on all the evidence that the state had. Pickens v. State, 2022 Ga. App. LEXIS 209 (Apr. 22, 2022).*

2255 petitioner gets no CoA for appeal of his habeas denial. The suppression motion was fully litigated and appealed and he lost. Palmer v. Black, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 10974 (6th Cir. Apr. 21, 2022).*

A Lyft car was stopped for a traffic violation, and the passenger piqued the officer’s interest. The officer confirmed that the passenger was wanted for eluding, and he was ordered out of the car for a frisk. He admitted he had a gun. The frisk finding the gun was reasonable, and that makes the Miranda argument moot. State v. Price-Williams, 2022 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 48 (Apr. 22, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.