D.Maine: Officer’s subjective motivations for crime fighting didn’t make an otherwise reasonable traffic stop unreasonable

The state trooper that stopped defendant for an objective traffic violation apparently had subjective motivation to look for other crimes, but his subjective motives aren’t determinative of anything. United States v. Fagan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141949 (D. Maine July 29, 2021).

The car defendant was in was unreasonably stopped and searched, and this led to a search of the house. The unconstitutionality of the car search taints the house search because the house search isn’t attenuated. “The Court finds that there was no intervening circumstance in this case. Cpl. Barnett draws a direct causal nexus between the identity of Fields and the decision to search near the house. His testimony in no way indicates that the fruits of the search of the car led him to search near the house.” United States v. Fields, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141887 (M.D.La. July 29, 2021).*

Defendant’s vehicle was parked partly in the roadway, and that was reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. McGrath, 2021-Ohio-2605, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 2562 (2d Dist. July 30, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.