CA9: Denial of a suppression hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion; no contested facts, no abuse

Denial of a suppression hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Here, there were no contested facts, and the district court found that the use of a flashlight to illuminate defendant’s car seeing a gun in plain view was reasonable. United States v. Lake, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8058 (9th Cir. May 15, 2015).*

Temporary seizure of a weapon may be necessary for officer safety. Then, when the police discover that the defendant is a convicted felon, the evidentiary value of the gun becomes apparent. United States v. Parker, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61939 (E.D. La. May 12, 2015).*

Defendant’s 2255 was way off the mark; disjointed and rambling, including a purported Franks issue, and it failed to provide any basis for concluding that defense counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a losing motion. United States v. Tillage, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62292 (E.D. Tenn. May 8, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.