Daily Archives: April 29, 2024

E.D.N.Y.: To get CSLI, there must be some showing the phone was involved in the crime

Just saying that criminals usually have their cell phones on them is not sufficient for probable cause. Something tying the phone to the crime, however, is enough. Here it was text messages.United States v. Rutledge, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76534 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Community caretaking function, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: To get CSLI, there must be some showing the phone was involved in the crime

W.D.Ky.: Illegal stop that was suppressed not excluded in § 1983 case

“Although the marijuana in Codrington’s car was discovered through an unreasonable search, that is immaterial to the Court’s analysis because the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule does not apply to § 1983 proceedings. As long as the marijuana found in Codrington’s … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Illegal stop that was suppressed not excluded in § 1983 case

CO adopts Graham for state excessive force claims

Colorado adopts the Graham v. Connor standard for excessive force under state law. Plaintiff stated enough to overcome a motion to dismiss. Woodall v. Godfrey, 2024 COA 42 (Apr. 25, 2024).* “Scafidi’s ‘seizure’ was not unreasonable, because his arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on CO adopts Graham for state excessive force claims

D.Me.: Alleged statutory violation doesn’t warrant exclusionary rule

In a search of medical records, records were seized in excess of the scope of a prior Patient Records Order for information other than patient drug abuse, but that did not warrant suppression here because the Fourth Amendment was not … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Me.: Alleged statutory violation doesn’t warrant exclusionary rule

WaPo: Dating apps selling users’ sexual preferences

WaPo: Dating apps are collecting more of your information than you think by Chris Velasco (“Research from the Mozilla Foundation says these apps are getting ‘thirstier’ for our data”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Dating apps selling users’ sexual preferences