Daily Archives: May 26, 2021

S.D.Ind.: Parole-probation searches are governed by 4A reasonableness but shaped by state law limiting them

The probation or parole search law and reasonableness is a Fourth Amendment question but it’s shaped by state law on how those searches are permitted as a condition of release. This one was reasonable. United States v. Beechler, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Parole-probation searches are governed by 4A reasonableness but shaped by state law limiting them

OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

Officers don’t need reasonable suspicion to approach a person for a potential consensual encounter. State v. Howard, 2021-Ohio-1792, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1734 (10th Dist. May 25, 2021). Defendant’s Facebook Live posting of him holding an AK-47 and smoking marijuana … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Officers don’t need RS to approach someone on the street

CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

“[T]he disclosure of the plaintiffs’ medical records to law enforcement officers for the purpose of investigating Dr. Pompy’s allegedly illegal activities did not violate their Fourth Amendment rights or their constitutional right to privacy.” Micks-Harm v. Nichols, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: Disclosure of medical records to LEO by subpoena duces tecum doesn’t violate 4A

CO: Impeachment exception to exclusionary rule permits defendant to testify truthfully without opening door to suppressed evidence

The impeachment exception to the exclusionary rule does not bar truthful testimony under the right to present a defense. The trial court has to tailor working around suppressed evidence to enable the defendant to testify truthfully, albeit incompletely because of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CO: Impeachment exception to exclusionary rule permits defendant to testify truthfully without opening door to suppressed evidence