Monthly Archives: January 2021

CA6: “Hey, man, I said come here” was still a consensual encounter

The district court’s finding of fact is not clearly erroneous. The officer said he said “please” and defendant said he said “Hey, man. … Hey, come here,” and when defendant continued to walk, the officer supposedly yelled, “Hey, man, I … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: “Hey, man, I said come here” was still a consensual encounter

NC: Mere visitor on the premises shouldn’t have been searched without articulatable RS

Defendant was a visitor on the premises when a search warrant was executed. A full search of his person was unreasonable because there were no facts shown justifying a belief he was armed or dangerous. The dissents view would hollow … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: Mere visitor on the premises shouldn’t have been searched without articulatable RS

CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

“Heck bars Mr. Hooks from recovering damages based on the first four alleged uses of force. Mr. Hooks’s no contest plea to two counts of assault and battery of a police officer means he admitted repeatedly hitting the officers before … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

M.D.Pa.: Conduct shown in affidavit was “protracted” and it wasn’t stale

The search warrant wasn’t stale because the conduct under investigation was “protracted.” “Williams’ piecemeal approach to the facts of the affidavit fails to acknowledge that probable cause is a holistic, totality-of-the-circumstances assessment. … The age of some of the historical … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Conduct shown in affidavit was “protracted” and it wasn’t stale