MN: Mere propinquity to armed person not RS

Frisk of appellant for merely being near an armed person was without reasonable suspicion. In re C.T.B., 2025 Minn. LEXIS 392 (Aug. 13, 2025).

There was arguable probable cause for defendant’s arrest. The claim that evidence was fabricated fails. “But a claim based on the alleged fabrication of evidence poses a ‘high bar to clear’: Mack must prove not only that Clausell’s identification as described in the officers’ reports was false, but also that the officers ‘manufactured’ it.” Mack v. City of Chi., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20594 (7th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Whether the officer touching the windshield as he peered through it for a plain view was a Fourth Amendment trespass wasn’t clearly presented below so it’s not appealable. United States v. Martinez, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20788 (10th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Defendant didn’t get seized until he was captured after he fled to avoid a possible frisk. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157794 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Trespass, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.