CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

Defendant doesn’t challenge the stop or the frisk, just the seizure of the baggie of drugs that the officer felt in his “watch pocket.” The officer could tell what it was by its feel. Affirmed. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9621 (3d Cir. Apr. 23, 2025).*

Defendant’s cell phone search in Malaysia isn’t shown to be a search by the U.S. Government, even though the phone was sent to NYC for prosecution. The delay in the return wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Hiya, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76609 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2025).

The police were sufficiently involved in the private search of defendant’s motorcycle saddlebag at work that it qualifies as a state search. People v. Tomasello, 2025 NY Slip Op 50570(U), 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2514 (Erie Co. Apr. 2, 2025).*

Plaintiff was at a Texas fitness center with her child when police in tactical gear showed up to execute a DNA warrant from Louisiana, taking her into custody and removing her to a police station instead of just taking the DNA sample. They get qualified immunity because plaintiff can’t point to a case in point. Bass v. Jackson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76786 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2025).* (This isn’t going in the supplement because: (a) it’s qualified immunity [which needs to be done away with, and this is one reason why], and (b) it’s just wrong [one shouldn’t need a case exactly on point when it’s intuitively just bad]. She can’t even move to suppress in a criminal case because she hasn’t been charged.]

This entry was posted in Foreign searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.