DE: Nexus for SW for car did not extend to def’s house

The nexus in the affidavit for the warrant for defendant’s car did not extend to his house, so there was no probable cause for the house search. (The search is valid, however, from inevitable discovery. “That said, because the State has met its burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that routine police investigatory procedures were already underway and the challenged behavior merely accelerated the discovery of the evidence, the inevitable discovery doctrine applies and the Motion to Suppress the Residence Warrant is therefore DENIED.”) State v. Heck, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 704 (Oct. 17, 2024).

“After considering these [Graham] factors, we conclude that Snyder’s single use of the taser was objectively reasonable under the circumstances. Coriell was both actively resisting arrest and attempting to evade arrest by flight. Upon exiting the vehicle, Coriell pushed Snyder away and resisted Snyder’s attempts to restrain him. He then fled on foot. Snyder used his taser to halt Coriell’s attempted flight. He did not use more force than was necessary.” Coriell v. Snyder, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26376 (11th Cir. Oct. 18, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s § 1983 false arrest claim was barred by statute of limitations, filed one day too late. Griffin v. Hunter, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26437 (6th Cir. Oct. 17, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.