M.D.Pa.: Even summary denial of 4A claim in state court means Stone bar applies

Even a summary denial of a Fourth Amendment claim gets deference under Stone v. Powell. Burns v. Hainsworth, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138877 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2024).

Petitioner’s successor habeas petition claim based on an alleged fabricated search warrant, even if credited, doesn’t show actual innocence or that it is newly discovered. In re Moya-Feliciano, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19591 (11th Cir. Aug. 5, 2024).*

Petitioner seeks a CoA on numerous 2254 claims. His Fourth Amendment claim is defaulted but barred by Stone in any event. It is a mere disagreement with the state court. Martin v. Scott, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19612 (6th Cir. Aug. 5, 2024).*

No ineffective assistance of counsel: “Nothing in the record suggests a factual or legal basis on which appellate counsel could have challenged the trial court’s ruling on direct appeal.’ Hayes v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138907 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.