CA8: Ptfs stated claim to overcome qualified immunity and arguable probable cause during mass arrests of peaceful protesters

Qualified immunity was denied for officers who were alleged to have arrested peaceful protestors in St. Louis in 2017. People were allowed to enter an area and then were arrested. As to force, “The pleadings before us and video evidence paint a picture of a compliant individual among a generally peaceful and compliant crowd who was boxed into an intersection by police, pepper sprayed, and forcefully arrested. Specific questions as to whether ‘kettling’ a crowd was in-and-of-itself excessive force, whether the application of the zip-ties caused the requisite ‘de minimis injury’ to establish a constitutional violation, or whether Baude was truly compliant cannot be answered on this limited record. Based on the allegations and on this record, we cannot conclude as a matter of law that the force used against Baude, when viewing the alleged facts in a light most favorable to him, was objectively reasonable.” Baude v. Leyshock, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2510 (8th Cir. Jan. 27, 2022). See Law360: 8th Circ. Says No Immunity For ‘Kettling’ By St. Louis Cops

Mindgeek was sued for aiding sex trafficking because Doe’s boyfriend posted porn of her under 18 on some of its websites. A search warrant was executed for Mindgeek’s servers, but it’s not a federal criminal defendant. “[T]he Court must follow the mandatory language of §1595(b) and stay the case until the criminal action is resolved.” Doe v. Mindgeek USA, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251759 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 28, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.