CA7: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

The confrontation clause does not apply in suppression hearings. United States v. Bebris, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20974 (7th Cir. July 15, 2021).

The apartment’s search warrant was for evidence of drug sales from it. Those found there at the time are subject to frisk. People v. Rashid, 2021 NY Slip Op 04390, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4513 (3d Dept. July 15, 2021).

Transporting untaxed cigarettes from one reservation to another on non-Indian land is not illegal in NY, so the search of the truck’s cargo was unreasonable. Matter of White v. N.Y. Tax Appeals Tribunal, 2021 NY Slip Op 04394, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505 (3d Dept. July 15, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Privileges, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.