CA7: When false arrest is the claim, ptf’s bond conditions are not separate seizures for SoL purposes

Plaintiff’s false evidence claim arises from the arrest or release from detention, and here it is time barred. His release on detention was not a separate Fourth Amendment seizure. Smith v. City of Chi., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 19136 (7th Cir. June 28, 2021).*

Plaintiff showed enough to survive summary judgment that handcuffs were too tight and caused an injury. The District Court improperly relied on the dashcam because it didn’t show much of this. Hughey v. Easlick, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 19130 (6th Cir. June 28, 2021).*

A gun of a felon and drug in plain view were probable cause to arrest defendant in his own home. Then he consented to a search of his cell phone. United States v. McFadden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119667 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2021).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.