KS: Paying for a car you don’t own doesn’t give standing

Just because defendant paid for the car he was a passenger in, it wasn’t his. He lacked standing in the car. State v. Scheuerman, 2021 Kan. App. LEXIS 15 (Apr. 16, 2021).

2255 petitioner’s claim the video to his surveillance system was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is rejected on post-conviction. He had a full and fair opportunity to litigate it before conviction. Forrest v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73353 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2021).*

Defendant’s arrest at the airport was with probable cause for a sex offense, and his statement is not suppressed. That statement corroborated the alleged victim’s version. King v. State, 2021 Alas. App. LEXIS 38 (Apr. 16, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.