OH5: If suppression court goes off on an unaddressed issue, the parties get to respond

If the trial court in a suppression hearing goes off in another direction not raised by the parties, the parties get to respond. Here, the state was on notice. State v. Arthur, 2021-Ohio-104, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 100 (5th Dist. Jan. 19, 2021); State v. Philabaum, 2021-Ohio-102, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 99 (5th Dist. Jan. 19, 2021);* State v. Madison, 2021-Ohio-103, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 105 (5rh Dist. Jan. 19, 2021).*

Defendant’s stopping in the crosswalk, ostensibly to see out into the intersection better which is a concession she didn’t stop at the stop bar, justified the stop on reasonable suspicion. State v. Pugh, 2020-Ohio-7019, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4867 (4th Dist. Dec. 22, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.