W.D.Ky.: How def answered other questions during his stop was pertinent to the voluntariness of his later consent

How defendant answered other questions about his paperwork and where he was going was important to show that he understood when asked for consent on the totality of circumstances. United States v. Reyes-Martinez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217510 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 25, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217311 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 19, 2020).

A warrant to seize a cell phone generally includes the ability to search it, too. United States v. Clarke, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219112 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 3, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.