A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: There’s little REP in a shared desk, and search of desk didn’t make it into SW affidavit

Appellant was an Air Force OSI investigator investigated for fraud against the government for false travel vouchers. A search of a shared desk by a coworker produced some documentation, but the government was already on to him, and a civilian judge authorized a search warrant for his off base housing producing the real evidence of fraud. When he returned from his honeymoon, his backpack was searched under a military oral search authorization reduced to writing the next day. The shared desk likely had little privacy in it under O’Connor v. Ortega, but that’s not even pertinent because that didn’t enter into the search warrant application. United States v. Eppes, 2017 CCA LEXIS 152 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Feb. 21, 2017).*

Window tint so dark the officer couldn’t see into the car in the dark was reasonable suspicion for the stop without knowing specifically what the law was. State v. Moore, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 123 (March 16, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.