N.D.Ohio: Nexus to house shown by controlled buys

“[T]he affidavit only needs to show a ‘nexus’ between the place to be searched and the evidence sought. [¶] A common-sense reading of the affidavit leads to the conclusion that there is a nexus between the residence and the evidence of ‘any illegal narcotics and drug paraphernalia.’” Two controlled buys provided that. United States v. Davison, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96553 (N.D.Ohio July 25, 2016).*

Yet again, and for the upteenth time, the Court of Federal Claims holds that the Fourth Amendment is not a “money mandating” provision, and it thus lacks jurisdiction. Johnson v. United States, 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1021 (July 26, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.