Daily Archives: August 19, 2017

CA8: RS on totality to frisk a gang member in the middle of a rival gang’s territory

Gang officers had reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant when they encountered him outside an apartment building occupied by rival gang members in the middle of another gang’s territory. He was standing between two illegally parked cars talking to occupants of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: RS on totality to frisk a gang member in the middle of a rival gang’s territory

CA7: Plainclothes officers have to ID themselves when making a stop

“The jury instructions on Terry stops, however, were inadequate. Over Doornbos’s objection, the court instructed the jury only on investigatory stops but not frisks. Yet Officer Williamson’s own testimony indicates that he was starting a frisk when he first approached … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Plainclothes officers have to ID themselves when making a stop

CA6: Def consented to search of person when he came out of bathroom and was accosted by two officers

“Perhaps the last thing one usually expects when exiting the bathroom is to find a police officer on the other side of the door. However, such was the situation Tremaine Cowan discovered when he exited the restroom of a private … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Def consented to search of person when he came out of bathroom and was accosted by two officers

CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification

While group strip searches at a jail are invasive, there is a penological justification offered that plaintiff doesn’t answer. There is no clearly established law that these are unreasonable. “The issue we face is whether periodically conducting group strip searches … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification