D.P.R.: Mere possession of a car doesn’t show standing

Just having possession of a car doesn’t show standing. How did it come to be? United States v. Luna-Irizarry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232412 (D.P.R. Oct. 8, 2026):

Here, the testimony of Mr. Luna regarding how he obtained possession of the Honda Pilot was vague at best, unbelievable at worst. He allegedly obtained the Honda Pilot via exchange with a friend he only knows as Omi. He met Omi “in the water.” Defendant does not know how Omi obtained possession of the car. He also does not know the person that appears as the registered owner of the vehicle. Mr. Luna’s claim that he has shown a legitimate expectation of privacy is solely based on his self-serving testimony that he had possession the vehicle (he had the keys), used it regularly, had the right to exclude others, kept personal property in it, and no one demanded that he give the vehicle back. This is insufficient, in the undersigned’s view, to show standing on a theory of lawful possession and control of the vehicle.

This entry was posted in Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.