Cal.4: School resource officers need RS for a weapons search in school

School resource officers also need reasonable suspicion for a weapons search in school, and here the officer had it. At a middle school no less. In re N.S., 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 548 (4th Dist. Sep. 8, 2026).

As long as there’s a factual basis for a traffic stop, it’s reasonable, even if pretextual, and “a citation need not be issued for the traffic violation in order for a traffic stop to be considered valid.” United States v. Gustafson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202638 (D. Mont. Sep. 8, 2026).*

Defendant’s effort to inject a reasonable expectation of privacy into a dog sniff because detection some drugs could reveal a medical condition is rejected. United States v. Ostertag, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 27550 (10th Cir. Sep. 8, 2026).*

The state conceded standing [but apparently shouldn’t have], but defendant’s girlfriend consented to the search of the premises. Sisson v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 300 (Sep. 4, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, School searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.