D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

The government’s subpoena for defendant’s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against disclosure in juvenile records. Therefore, disclosure is not a “search.” United States v. Silva, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149439 (D.N.M. July 7, 2026).

The record supports the trial court’s finding there was no exigency for dispensing with a warrant. It’s not the appellate court’s job to reweigh the evidence. State v. Ford, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289 (Fla. 2d DCA July 10, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop was for speeding both on the highway and in a construction zone. Upon smelling marijuana, it was not unreasonable for the officer to open the car door. State v. Jordan, 2026-Ohio-2625 (4th Dist. July 1, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.