SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

Defendant submitted to GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of bail, and the police could call the bondsman for the GPS information to connect defendant to a new crime without a warrant. State v. Eberhart, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 41 (July 1, 2026).

Here, there were two apartments, an upper and lower. Defendant was the upper. He had no standing to a search of the lower. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147747 (W.D.N.Y. May 20, 2026).*

Even if some details leading to the stop were incorrect or maybe even false, the main facts added up to reasonable suspicion. United States v. Mason, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145531 (N.D. Ohio July 1, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.