Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

The VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Wyman v. James. The statute gives the VA that discretion. Latham v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17328 (Fed. Cir. June 16, 2026) (2 Search and Seizure § 43.33).

Defendant had no standing to challenge the search of a passenger’s fanny pack. United States v. Haslam, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146116 (E.D. Mich. July 1, 2026).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop as a felon in possession and handcuffs were reasonable for officer safety. United States v. Westfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120520 (E.D. Okla. May 5, 2026),* adopted 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118669 (E.D. Okla. May 29, 2026),* later proceeding 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145294 (E.D. Okla., June 25, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.